As Muscovy stole the history of Kievan Rus-Ukraine. REPORT of the doctor of historical sciences


Creating your Ukrainian State, Ukrainians should revise and clarify its story based on truth, verifiable facts and historical events. While for centuries under the rule of the conquerors, the Ukrainians were actually deprived of the possibility of influencing the formation of national consciousness and development history, resulting in the history of Ukraine is written predominantly in favor of these invaders. Especially not clarified is whether claims and pretensions of Muscovy and later of Russia, on the heritage of Kievan Rus.

In the novel-study. Belinsky (country Moksel′ or Muscovy//Kyiv: publishing them. Olena Teliha, 2008, 2009, in three books) reported facts, culled from historical sources (mostly Russian) that indicate a fundamental distortion of the history of the Russian Empire aimed at creating historical mythology that Kievan Rus and Muscovy have common historical roots, Muscovy has "inheritance" to Russia.

Ordinary Russians fraud, arrogating past Grand Principality of Kiev and its people, dealt a terrible blow to the Ukrainian ethnic group. The challenge now is to based on truthful facts reveal the falsehood and amorality of Moscow mythology.

Take a look at the main issues of the problem.

Moscow, and later the Russian Czars understood that without great past cannot create a great nation, a great empire. For this purpose it was necessary to decorate its historic past and even assign someone else's. Therefore Moscow Kings, starting with Ivan IV (the terrible) (1533-1584), was tasked to assign the history of Kievan Rus, its glorious past and create the official mythology of the Russian Empire.

On this could be ignored if this mythology do not affect Aboriginal interests of Ukraine, was not aimed at the total destruction of Ukraine-its history, language, culture. Time has shown that the Russian imperšovinisty have done and are doing everything possible to achieve this objective.

For centuries, especially with the beginning of the 16th century. in the heads of people inspired and inspire the Russian State and the Russian people originate from the Grand Principality of Kiev; that Kievan Rus-the cradle of three fraternal peoples-Russian, Ukrainian and Belarusian; the Russians under the law "staršebratstva" entitled to the legacy of Kievan Rus '. This pathetic lie still enjoys Russian historiography and statesmen in Russia, as well as a "fifth column" in Ukraine, which includes the Communists, party or former Regionals in the Verkhovna Rada.

It is known that:

-During the existence of the State of Kievan Rus ' of the Muscovite State was not a single mention. It is known that the Moscow Principality, as ulus of the Golden Horde, founded by Khan Mengu-Timur only in the year 1277. Kyivska Rus at that time already existed for more than 300 years;

-There was no evidence on the relationship of Kievan Rus with the Finnish ethnic group "Moksel′" and later with Moscow Principality principalities of Kievan Rus ' lands until the 16th century. While the year saw 988 baptism of Kievan Rus state, Finnish tribes land "Moksel′" were in the spot position.


How can you talk about some of the "older brother", where the "big brother" was born several centuries later the Ruthenians-Ukrainians. He has no moral right to call themselves the "elder brother" dictating rules mankind existence, impose their culture, language, and worldview.

It is known that by the end of the 15th century. There was no Russian State, there was no "great elder brother" and the Russian people, and was Suzdal land-land Moksel′, and later Moscow Principality, being a part of the Golden Horde-powers Chingizids. From the late 13TH to early 18th century. the people of this land were called Russians. Moscow historians were silent on the issue of its national origin.


Muscovites, had Russians-who are they?

Muscovites. In the 9th-12th centuries. a big edge from Tula, Ryazan and Moscow region, merya, moksha, the CHUD, Mordvins, Mari and others-all this people «moksel′». These tribes subsequently became the basis for people prozvavšego themselves "velikorossy".

In 1137 g. on these lands came to the youngest son of the Grand Prince Yuri Dolgorukiy-Monomakh, who was left without a princely backgrounds in Kiev Principality. Yuri dolgoruky started the reign of Rurik dynasty on the lands of "Moksel′", topped the suzdal Principality. He dated women local tribe born son Andrew, who was named "Andrew". Born and raised in the backwoods in semi-wild Wednesday Finnish tribes, Prince Andrew broke all ties with the parent team and old Kyiv.


Yuri Dolgoruki and Andrei Bogolyubsky

In 1169, 2010. Andrei Bogolyubsky captured and destroyed Kiev: come as a barbarian who felt no affinity with Slavonic sanctuary-Kiev.

For a short time (50-80 years) in each Finnish settlement was planted by Prince from the Rurik dynasty, a native of merânki, muromčanki, moksha. Appeared on Earth "Moksel′" in the Principality: Vladimir, Ryazan, Tver and others.

At this time on Earth "Moksel′" begin to penetrate the individual missionaries in spreading Christianity. The "flow" of the Slavs from the Dnieper to the ground "Moksel′", as claimed by Moscow historians can't go no speech. What Slavs from the fertile lands along the Dnieper going through the impenetrable thickets and bogs thousands of miles away in an unknown half-savage wilderness?

On the basis of Christianity in the land of "Moksel′" it is beginning to emerge, which in time became Russian.

By the 12th century. in the lands of "Moksel′" lived only Finnish tribes. This is confirmed by archaeological excavations and. With. Uvarov ("Merâne and their way of life on excavations, allele 1872-215). In the excavated kurgans 7729 not detected nor Slavic burial.

Anthropological studies. P. Bogdanov and s. K. VOVK, conducted a study of the human skulls confirm the excellent features of the Finnish and Slavic ethnic groups.

In 1237,. the Suzdal land came the Tatar-Mongols. All those swaying his head, kissing the boots of Khan and took his allegiance remained alive and unharmed, who did not want to obey-destroyed. Princes of Vladimir Yuri and Yaroslav Vsevolodoviči subjugated Khan Batu. Thus, the land of "Moksel′" became part of the Golden Horde Empire Chingizids and its military force joined the military forces of the Empire.



He headed the military team "Moksel′" comprising troops of Batu Khan Vladimir Prince Yuri Vsevolodovich. The fact of forming in 1238 military brigade of the Finnish tribes, which were used by Batu in aggressive campaigns in Europe in 1240-1242, is a direct evidence establishing the authorities in Rostov-Suzdal lands.

For the period of the military campaign of Yuri Vsevolodovich in Vladimir Principality was the younger brother of Yuri-Yaroslav Vsevolodovich, who gave Khan Batu Khan of his eight-year-old son Alexander Yaroslavich in Karachai Amanat (i.e. hostage). After the Horde at Batu with 1238 to 1252 g. Alexander, named and famed Russian historians as Nevsky learned the entire structure and customs of the Golden Horde became Andom (blood brother) son of Batu Sartaka, married the daughter of Batu Khan and subsequently became a faithful servant of the Golden Horde, leading the Volodimirskoe Principality (1252-1263). He was not involved in any major battle, all the victories of Alexander Nevsky-a pathetic lie. Prince Alexander simply could not participate in the fighting on the Neva in 1240 g. and on Lake Peipus in 1242 g. While still a child.


Alexander Nevsky

It should be noted that the administrative authority of the Rostov-suzdal Princes was minimal. Khan Batu to guide the Principality (ulusom) appointed by the Governor-big baskak, and field-specific baskaky. These were the full powers of the rulers of the Golden Horde, who are guided by the laws of the Iasi Chingizids.

Lie of Russian historians, suzdal, and later princes were independent from the Golden Horde. The first ruler of the Principality (ulus) in Khan's literacy named baskak or daruga, and princes were considered at the second or third place.

A lie is and what Moscow founded Yuri Dolgoruky in 1147. It is a myth that has no evidence. Moscow as a settlement was founded in 1272. This year was held the third census of the Golden Horde. When the first census (1237-1238 pp.) and second (1254-1259 pp.) settlement-Moscow is not mentioned.

As the Principality of Muscovy in 1277 g. at the behest of the Tatar-Mongol Khan mengu-Timur and was a regular ulusom of the Golden Horde. The first Moscow Prince Daniil (1277-1303) (youngest son of Alexander of TN "Nevsky"). Dynasty originates from him Moscow rulers of the Rurik dynasty. In 1319 Khan Uzbeg (referred to in the aforementioned novel study. Belinsky) appointed his brother Kulhana specific Moscow Prince, and with 1328 g. -The Grand Prince of Moscow. In Russian historical literature named as "Kalita" Khan Uzbeg, adopting Islam, destroyed almost all the Princes of the Rurik dynasty. In 1319-1328 pp. Rurik dynasty change took place in the dynasty of Chingizids ulus of the Golden Horde in Moscow. And 1598 in Muscovy interrupted dynasty kind of Genghis Khan, which started from Prince Ivan Kalita (Kulhana). Then there are about 270 years Moscow was ruled by pure descent from Genghis Khan.


Ivan Kalita

The new dynasty of the Romanovs (Kobylinyh) in 1613 undertook to cherish old traditions and brought an oath of allegiance to the old dynasty of chingizids

Orthodox Church in Moscow, 1613. became a stabilizing force for storing the tataro-Mongolian statehood in Muscovy.

The data shows that the Muscovy is the direct successor of the Golden Horde State Chingizids, there is, in fact, Tatar-Mongols were godparents fathers ", Moscow. Moscow Principality (and since 1547 g. Kingdom) had no ties in the XVI century. with the principalities of Kievan Rus ' lands.


Alexander Nevsky begs Batu Khan to spare the Earth Russian. Tinted engraving of the 19th century.

Had Russians. Tribe or people Russian Russians, as it is called today, appeared around XV-XVII centuries. among Finnish tribes: murom, as Vesey and others. Then there is his story. No history of Russians Kiev on Earth! History of Russians begins with "Zaleŝans′koj land", with Muscovy, which have never been Russia. Tatar-Mongols, came to these lands, have contributed significantly to the formation of the "Russians". On the psychology of velikorusskuû left an imprint of borrowing the Tatar-Mongol conqueror instinct, despot, whose main goal is world domination.

So in the XVI century. formed a human type-conqueror, terrible in its ignorance, anger and cruelty. These people do not require a European culture and writing, they are alien to categories such as morality, honesty, shame, honesty, dignity, historical memory, etc. A significant part of the tataro-Mongols in the 13th-16th centuries. joined in the composition of the Russians, of whom begin their pedigree more than 25% of the Russian "nobility". Here are some names of the Tatars, who have brought glory to the Empire: Canney, Bunin, Griboyedov, Derzhavin, Dostoevsky, Kuprin, Plekhanov, Mikhail saltykov-Shchedrin, Turgenev, sheremetev, Chaadaev and many others.

To assign the history of Kievan Rus and perpetuate this theft, velikorossam it was necessary to subdue the Ukrainian people, to drive him to slavery, denying his own name, starving etc.

Ukrainians, who emerged as a nation in the XI-XII centuries, and possibly before, declared a "little Russians" and began to present this version of around the world. For the slightest deviation from this version people executed, deleted, exiled to gulag. The Soviet period has been especially brutal. While Ukraine lost more than 25 million of its sons and daughters who have died in wars over the interests of Russia, during collectivization, in links and torture chambers.

So "big brother", "great Rusian" forced to live "younger brother", "little" in the cruel "arms of love".


During the reign of Basil III (1505-1533) in Moscow's idea of greatness, which Moscow expressed orthodoxy monk Philotheus: "Two Rome fell, and third, and fourth not to be". Since then, the Russians have been germinating the idea of omnipotence and "bogoizbrannosti" that "Moscow-Rome" is the third and final. These thoughts were circulated and approved in Muscovy. How much blood has been shed Moscow princes, and later Kings for this idea-Breda.

In the reign of Ivan IV (the terrible) claims of Muscovy to inherit not only of Kievan Rus ' and the Byzantine Empire and amplified. So, according to legend, Monomakh's Cap, supposedly donated by Kiev Prince Vladimir Monomakh his grandfather-bazilevsom Constantine IX, was considered a symbol of the transfer of power to the Byzantine Empire of Kievan Rus. Given that the first Prince of Suzdal was the sixth son of Vladimir Monomakh, Yuriy Dolgorukiy in Moscow that caps is "proof" of hereditary rights of Moscow rulers not only in Kiev, but the Grand throne and inheritance of the former Byzantine Empire. Next was drafted false testament of Vladimir Monomakh «transfer of inheritance rights "son of Prince Yuri dolgoruky, conqueror of the so-called" Zaleŝans′koj "of the Earth. It was all fiction. Actually, Monomakh's Cap was Golden Bukhara, which Khan Uzbeg tubeteika Cap gave Ivan Kalita (1319-1340), which adapted the skullcap for his exaltation. (Logvin Yu. "Mare, Kalita and skullcap" Monomakh "//time. Kiev, March 27, 1997).


The so-called cap of Monomakh

Ivan IV (the terrible), for the first time in 1547. got married in the Church with the title of Tsar, as "wannabe" Greek and Roman emperors. Of the 37 signatures that sealed instrument sent from Constantinople to Moscow, 35 were fraudulent. So Abraham Lincoln became heir to the Byzantine emperors. So has got a lie.


Ivan The Terrible

Massive Government falsification of the history of his people started Peter. He first in 1701 g. Decree on the removal of the conquered peoples have all written national monuments: Chronicles, Chronographs, chronicles, ancient historical records, Church documents, archives, etc. This is particularly true of Ukraine-RUS.

In 1716 g. Peter "takes a copy of" the so-called Konigsberg Chronicle, where the Union was shown an ancient Chronicle of the Kiev and Moscow principalities and the rationale of the unity of the Slavic and Finnish lands. However, access to "copy"-bogus, as the most original, was closed.


Forger Peter

This falsification of Petrova became the basis for further rigging-writing t. n. «Obshcherusskih Chronicle of the arches, which was premised on the right of Muscovy on heredity of Kievan Rus. On the basis of these 22 October 1721, rigged. Muscovy declared itself the Russian Empire and Russians-Russians. So was stolen from legitimate successors of Kievan Rus '-Ukrainians historical name Rus.

Peter brought from Europe a large number of professionals, including professionals, historians, were attracted to writing and falsification of history of the Russian State.

To do this, every foreigner entered the Indian civil service, gave an oath of non-disclosure of State secrets and pledged never to leave the Moscow State. The question arises, what could be the State secrets during processing of Russian history» ancient times? In any civilised European country after 30-50 years rassekrečivaûtsâ all the files. The Russian Empire is afraid the truth about his past. Deathly afraid!

After Peter the great, who transformed the Muscovy in Russian Government, Moscow's elite began to wonder about the need for a coherent history of their own country. For this thing carefully did Empress Catherine II (1762-1796), whereby not the thought that the Royal family she may be among the private Tatar-Mongolian nobility. Catherine II, European-educated man from archival sources, drew the attention of the entire history of the State is based on verbal epic mythology and has no evidence.


Catherine continued falsification

So Catherine II issued a decree dated 4 December 1783 which creates a Commission to compose notes about ancient history mostly Russia "under the guidance and supervision of a graph. P. Shuvalov, comprising 10 eminent historians. The main task entrusted to the Commission was to due to adaptations of the Chronicles, writing new Chronicle of the vaults and other falsifications justify "lawfulness" attribution of Muscovy historical heritage of Kievan Rus and the creation of a historical mythology of the Russian State. The Commission worked for 10 years. In 1792,. "Catherine's story was published. The work of the Commission were undertaken in the following areas:

All written documents (Chronicles, archives, etc.). This work has been partially was taken by Peter i. collection of materials was carried out not only from their home country, as well as from other countries-Poland, Turkey, etc..;

-Study, falsification, rewriting and destruction of historical materials. So were rewritten Chronicles: "the word about Igor's Regiment" tale of bygone years "," Chronicle "'s and many others. Some Chronicles texted a few times, and the originals destroyed or zasekrečivalis′.

So were classified "Scythian history". AND. Lyzlova, published in 1776 and 1787 Gg.., "Russian History since ancient times. N. Tatishchev, published by 1747g. In "the Scythian history" as well. AND. Lyzlova indicates that the residents of Muscovy is a separate distinct people, has nothing in common with Russia (WCS), Lithuania, Poles, etc.;

-Writing new obshcherusskih sets ", which were written in the 18th century, and were served so that they're 11th, 13th, and 14th centuries. All these sets have preached the idea of "obŝerusskuû". At a time when the Kiev land lived Slavonic tribes (glade, drevlyane, northerners, etc.) that were already Christians, in "Zaleŝans′kih" lands lived Finnish tribes (the muromians, merya, moksha whole etc.). that were in the spot and these tribes did not have anything in common in history until the XVI century;

-To justify the unity of Kievan Rus and Finnish tribes were written thousands of different sets. All of these vaults and Chronicles, as indicated in the novel-study. Belinsky, has only rewritten form, and none of the original. NO ONE!

All this points to the incredible arrogance and shamelessness scale falsification when creating a history of the Russian State.

We cannot live forever in a lie!

It's time to Ukrainian historians wrote the true story of Ukraine that would be based not on a rigged by Catherine II Chronicles and again written in the 18th century "obshcherusskih Chronicle vaults, but on historical facts, documented, in particular in countries such as Poland, Turkey, Greece, Iran, etc..

People must know the truth.

Jaroslaw DASHKEVICH, doctor of historical sciences


Leave a Reply